AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Better window manager ubuntu4/29/2023 ![]() ![]() This is highly annoying due in no small part to the lackluster documentation, but due to the slow release cycle, is rarely an issue. the development version so substantial configurations don't translate between the two. There is a huge difference between the version available on most repos vs. Releases take a while, due to decreasing dev activity and when they come, they tend to break everything and change some substantial aspects of the system. The development team is highly opinionated and in different ways, this pulls the window manager in different directions all while they got rid of their old, substantial documentation in favor of new, autogenerated documentation that might as well not exist because reading source code provides users better examples than the trash they call their API documentation. The issues with it are on the development side mostly, other than its God awful hideous default wallpaper that when configuring your system you cannot escape from as it will default to the default configuration with said wallpaper if there are errors. LovelyAristaeus's Experience I have written a 400+ file configuration for it over two years and dozens of rewrites, so I like the platform alot and think it is a stand out in the WM category in terms of opening up the potential to truly make anything one wants out of their desktop UI available to users willing to learn how to configure it, which requires more than just Lua as Lua works great elsewhere but this implementation, not so much. Therefore, as they do not use many resources they are often used in distributions that target low-end hardware or power users.įor stacking only window managers, please look here.įor tiling only window managers, please look here. Many often work well on low-end systems because they do not use as many resources to run, due to the majority being minimal by design. Many window managers are used by those who enjoy having complete control over their computing experiences, as well as those who enjoy minimal interfaces. While some window managers can, by design, take the place of a desktop environment, many of the features normally found in a desktop environment will not be included. This question in particular consists of all types of window managers, not to be confused with desktop environments. Within those three different categories are even more subcategories. Some window managers tile, some stack, and some float. Linux window managers are plentiful and can be very different from what most users are used to in the mainstream computing world. Every single WM on this list delivers in that department.Window Managers are X clients that control the frames around where graphics are drawn (what is inside a window). What these window managers lack in visual beauty,they make up for in functionality. This way of using a computer is definitely niche. For the most part, it’s great, but it takes a special kind of person to want to do that. Seeing as how (with most) you can’t just learn everything by exploring, you have to crack open the manual and learn how it works. Admittedly, they do have a bit of a barrier to entry. On top of all that, Xmonad sports a fairly big extension library (which can add on even more functionality). It works out-of-the-box and is very user friendly. Like most (if not all) window managers, it comes with no frills or window decorations. Xmonad is a tiling window manager written in Haskell. Easy keyboard shortcuts allow for a great navigation experience while managing windows. All modifications to DWM can be done within its source code. It’s also possible to lay the windows out in a floating or monocle style. Tiling isn’t the only way you can manage your windows. It adheres to FreeDesktop standards (Desktop notifications system, system tray, etc.) and has great keybindings which make navigating with it effortless.ĭWM is, well, a dynamic window manager. Much like i3, it claims to have well-documented code to make it very easy to dig right into for modifications. It is probably the most user-friendly on the list. All of the interactions with your windows are done with keyboard shortcuts.Īwesome has a unique take on the concept of a tiling window manager. The developers boast that it has no “fancy graphics” or “decorations” of any kind, just a straight-up tiling window setup. Ratpoison is a simple window manager that has “no fat library dependencies”. With extremely easy to remember keybindings, using i3 is extremely enjoyable, even without the need for a mouse. It supports xinerama and makes use of libxcb instead of xlib. It has clean and fully documented code that makes it real simple to modify and tinker with. ![]() ![]() ![]() If you’re looking for a way to use Linux that is bloat free, tiling window managers might just be what you’ve been looking for. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |